1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding the following determination as to the plaintiff's new argument at the trial of the court of first instance under Chapter 6, Chapter 4, of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The Plaintiff claimed KRW 4,129,500 from the lost loss, but the court of the first instance recognized KRW 4,140,802 and asserted that it violates the disposition authority principle. Thus, the Plaintiff calculated the lost profit by applying the higher standard than the Defendant’s wage claimed.

Even if the defendant did not order the payment in excess of the defendant's claim amount, it cannot be said that it violated the principle of disposition in the scope of compensation for damages.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.