A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

From October 197, the Defendant managed F apartment Nos. 49 and 202 of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was owned by the victim, on behalf of the victim E, who is a early passenger of E, and the above apartment was reconstructed into Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G apartment Nos. 120 and 1402 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

1. Around December 13, 2011, the Defendant: (a) leased the instant real estate to H; (b) demanded H to cancel the registration of the right to claim transfer of ownership established in the future of the Defendant; and (c) cancelled the registration; (b) in order to secure the right to claim the said real estate, he/she had the intention to forge a written confirmation using a certificate of seal impression and a certificate of seal impression, which had been delegated by E to sell and purchase the said real estate, and a certificate

On January 5, 2012, the Defendant agreed to claim only the rights less than KRW 290 million, E, the right holder, when selling or selling the said real estate, as a condition for termination of provisional registration of A, which is the right holder, at the office of the Defendant, I apartment Icheon-si, Icheon-si, 338 Dong 1503, and on January 27, 2012, “H wanting to terminate provisional registration of the said real estate,” and then, upon purchasing or selling the said real estate under the condition for termination of provisional registration of A, the right holder, who is the right holder. In addition, in order to guarantee the old age of E, the Defendant agreed to receive the amount of the right claimed by E as financial pension goods, and that A, the right holder of the provisional registration, who has been managed so far, will be a trade agent, from the time of purchase, will be the owner of the right, E’E, and J of Daegu achieved-gun.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant is an attorney-at-law who, around January 5, 2012, has been aware of the forgery in order for a notary public to obtain a certification of the confirmation under paragraph (1) at a law firm-at-law office with the effect of 1594-1 en banc Decision 328, Gyeyang-dong, 1594-1, the law firm-at-law.