1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company that entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to B Pokes (hereinafter “instant Pokes”).

B. On November 2, 2006, around 19:56, there was an accident where the part of the back wheeler's right edge of the instant sckeer, which was driven by the Plaintiff (Cir male) on the side distance from the construction site of the Rabanon apartment at the Chungcheongnam-si and left left at the time without a license.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered serious injuries, such as the mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal, mathal mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathal, and mathal mathal,

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, Eul evidence 4 (in the case of each numbered evidence, including able evidence), the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The traffic accident of this case by the plaintiff's summary of the claim is a traffic accident where the error of the plaintiff's driving, who was in a direct position at the time of the Egras of this case and the left-hand turn, faces with each other.

Thus, the defendant, who is the insurer of this case, is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred to the plaintiff due to the traffic accident of this case. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount stated in the claim.

나. 피고의 주장요지 이 사건 교통사고가 신호등이 없는 ‘ㅓ’자형 삼거리에서 좌회전을 하던 포크레인과 오토바이의 사고인 점 등에 비추어 보면, 이 사건 교통사고는 오토바이 운전자인 원고의 과실로 발생한 것이므로, 원고의 청구에 응할 수 없다.

3. 판단 살피건대, 원고와 피고가 제출한 각 증거에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, ① 이 사건 사고는 신호가 없는 ‘ㅓ’자형 삼거리에서...