A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and August and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell, manufacture, import, use, store, transport or display for sale, functional health foods containing or suspected with poisonous or harmful substances, or functional health foods.

Nevertheless, around June 4, 2015, the Defendant purchased slot C501, from the Defendant’s house located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and sold it to the needy, after purchasing slot 30, slot scam, and slot scam, which contain a hazardous substance that causes brain scams and cardio-cerebric scamscamic reaction through the sales Internet site, such as Dacam auxiliary agents operated by D.

In addition, from June 4, 2015 to September 8, 2016, the Defendant purchased slot land 30, scinine 19 times, scinine 30, scinine scinine scinite, and scinine scinites, as indicated in the list of crimes in the same manner, and sold them to the winners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E (each copy of the protocol);

1. Sales statement (G-market) and payment statement of goods price;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the No. 13, 17, 29 of the evidence list);

1. The relevant Article of the Health Functional Foods Act and Articles 43 (1) 3 and 23 (2) and (2) of the Act on the Selection of Health Functional Foods for criminal facts shall be concurrently punished by imprisonment with prison labor and a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Provisional Payment Order, not only causes specific risks to public health, but also disturbs the distribution market of functional health foods, and the defendant has a history of being punished several times for the same crime, and there is a high possibility of criticism that the defendant has not been aware of the fact that he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment due to a violation of the Food Sanitation Act even though he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.