1. The Defendant: KRW 16,769,923 to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 7, 2015 to December 17, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and wife around 1981 adjoining E and F, the Defendant’s parents in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and they were well aware of them. There are children between E and F couple, G, the Defendant, and C have children.

B. By December 201, the Plaintiff lent KRW 60 million in total to F under the pretext of personal taxi vehicle-related prices and children school expenses, etc. Around September 2009, the Plaintiff additionally lent KRW 10 million to F and received promissory notes from F for the payment of each of the above loans. By June 2013, the remainder of the leased principal, excluding the amount paid as principal and interest, has reached KRW 55 million.

C. Meanwhile, when the Plaintiff demanded F to repay the loan to F in around 2006, the Defendant, the second wife of F, referred to the Plaintiff as “us will be liable for the amount of the loan to her money (or the loan to her)”, and “us shall divide our three forms of money into KRW 25 million, and the Plaintiff shall pay the amount of KRW 55 million and a small amount of KRW 25 million to her KRW 75 million.” The Defendant said to the Plaintiff and C several stories.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant sent each text message to the Plaintiff via C’s mobile phone, stating that “I, J, and K, at once, inform the Plaintiff of the account number inside at once,” and “I, even at once every month, I do not have any talk to send. I, only when I, I, I, I, and I, who are the addresses of E’s real estate owned by the Defendant on March 20, 2014.”

E. As of April 25, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a payment order with the purport that F would pay the Plaintiff KRW 5 million and delay damages (2014 tea7427), and around that time, the said payment order became final and conclusive.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 4, 5, and Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2.