beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant intended to act as a member of the “tele Financial Fraud Group” with a person whose name is unknown and as a member of the “tele Financial Fraud Group,” and intended to commit a crime of “tele Financial Fraud,” which receives money from victims, after deceiving an unspecified victim by telephone, and accordingly, attempted to commit a “tele Financial Fraud,” which receives money from victims. Accordingly, a person who was not aware of the name in charge of “induction,” by deceiving an unspecified number of victims to transfer money to an account in the name of the Defendant by deceiving the victims to transfer money while misrepresenting himself/herself, and the Defendant conspired to withdraw money immediately received from the branch office of a financial institution if money is deposited into his/her account by taking charge of “induction,” as seen above.
1. A person whose name was not known to be responsible for “induction” in accordance with the above solicitation as to the victim C was made on April 7, 2015, at a place where the location cannot be known, around 09:36, the victim received KRW 38,270,00 from the victim’s national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day on the following day: (a) “B is a strong one team of the prosecutor’s office; and (b) it is necessary for the victim to make a money laundering by creating a bank account in the name of the Defendant.”
At around 12:36 on the same day, the Defendant released the amount equivalent to KRW 38,00,000, out of the money transferred from the victim’s above account at the counter of the “The YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY 374,
2. A person whose name is not known to be responsible for the “induction” in accordance with the above solicitation against the victim D is the victim’s “induction” is the prosecutor of the Seoul High-tech Criminal Investigation Team E at the seat of April 7, 2015 where the location cannot be known and the victim’s “induction” is the victim.
The FF fraud case is involved in the fraudulent name theft case, and the victim is judged as being in the state of the request for accusation until today.