Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2019, the Defendant found and found one of the 1401 Mayang-dong-dong 1401 Mayang-dong-dong-dong-gu 1401 Mayang-dong-dong-dong-gu 1401 Mayang-dong-dong-dong-si 1, but did not take necessary measures, such as finding the owner of the above smartphone, and embezzled the property of which he escaped from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (Attachment to the Kakao Stockholm dialogue, and with regard to the specific victim);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes requesting provision of communications data;

1. Relevant Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On February 10, 2019, the Defendant embezzled the property that was occupied by the victim without taking necessary measures, such as finding the owner of the above smartphone, even though the Defendant discovered the victim DNA’s 1,100,000 won at the center of the river basin located in the Dong-dong in Ansan-si, in the middle of the river basin located in Ansan-si, around February 10, 2019, he/she embezzled the property that was abandoned by the victim without taking necessary measures, such as finding the owner of the above smartphone.

B. From Apr. 2019, the Defendant discovered one unit of Aphone X smartphone at the market price equivalent to one million won, which the victim G, who was aboard the said taxi, was laid away on the back seat of the said taxi before the Defendant, and carried it out in the taxi, in the middle of 01:0 on Apr. 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s summary of the Defendant’s assertion did not acquire two smartphones stated in this part of the facts charged.

One of the three smartphones listed in the facts charged in the judgment of the court below is that the defendant acquired the same, but the two of the smartphones listed in this part of the facts charged has C.