A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) in support of the development of the Suwon method and the National Police Agency on November 12, 2013, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for ten months, and had a total of six times of criminal punishment.

[2] On December 22, 2017, the Defendant, at around 22:50, at the delivery agency office of the Sinposi C1’s “D,” the Defendant was in dispute with the above “D” location E, and on the ground that the victim F (20 years of age) f (the victim’s f.) f.s. f.s. f.s.s. with the victim’s f.s. f.s. f. f.s. f. f. f.s. f. f. f.s. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

As a result, the Defendant carried a dangerous article with a stone, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an influence of the number of days of treatment, and an influence of the two skins.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on shooting photographs of criminal tools, photographs of the victim of violence;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation does not mean that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of being punished as the same kind of crime. However, it is against the mistake, and the injured person was the preference against the defendant by agreement with the victim. At the time of this case, the defendant was also subject to assault from the injured person, and all the other factors of sentencing including the defendant's age and environment are considered as the order.