1. Inboard (a) which connects each point of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 1 among the land of 992 square meters of C forest land in e.g., in sequence.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 4, 2013, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to C Forest C, 992 square meters (hereinafter “instant forest”). On April 15, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to shares of 5/7 out of the instant forest land.

B. Until the date of closing argument in the instant case, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not reach an agreement on the method of dividing the forest of this case.

Grounds for recognition: A1-4 (including various numbers for each number), the whole purport of the pleading.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff may seek a partition of co-owned property against the Defendant, who is another co-owner, as the co-owner of the forest of this case, for which the partition agreement was not reached.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the location, area, shape, purpose of use of the instant forest and the various circumstances revealed in the process of the instant pleadings, it is reasonable to divide the instant forest into the Defendant’s possession of each of the items in the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 1, and the portion of (i) part 708 square meters in the ship connected each of the items in sequence among the instant forest and the Plaintiff’s ownership, and the portion of (ii) part 3, 4, 5, and 3 of the same map into two parts in sequence.

3. In conclusion, this case’s forest land shall be divided as above and decided as per Disposition.