A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called "C" in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 813.

At around 22:30 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant received 140,000 won from a male who cannot know his name at the above sexual traffic business establishment, and arranged to do the act of similarity with D, a female sexual traffic, as seen above, from April 30, 2015 to June 10, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Intermediation of types 2 (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts by giving and receiving, etc.) (one to three years) in the area of aggravation (one year) (one year and three years), advertisement character or high radio wave of the types of commercial sex acts subject to 19 years of age or older;

2. The specific grounds for sentencing include: (a) the Defendant committed the same crime in a similar trade name from the lower police officer of November 201 to December 12, 2013; and (b) the Defendant had been punished by a fine of KRW 7 million on May 26, 2014; (c) however, the Defendant was found to have committed a second offense immediately thereafter; and (d) the Defendant was found to have committed a second offense; and (e) the Defendant was determined as per the disposition on the same grounds as the number of business offices in one studios.