logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.06.23 2015가합239
배당이의
Text

1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On December 13, 2007, 13. 1, 2007. 1,450,000,000 corporate general facility loan loans of KRW 100,000,000 on December 13, 207, 207. 700,000,000 on March 18, 201. 30,000 corporate common facility loan loans of KRW 40,000 on March 18, 201. 30,00,000 on March 18, 201, the National Bank (hereinafter “National Bank”) loaned to E a total of KRW 2,50,00,00 on four occasions as listed below.

(1) Under the order shown below, each of the loans against the National Bank E (hereinafter “the instant loans claim”), “the instant loans claim,” “the instant loans claim,” “the instant third loans claim,” and “the instant fourth loans claim,” and each of the above loans claims is collectively referred to as “each of the instant loans claim”). The National Bank completed the registration of establishment of a new mortgage against the Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G land and buildings on its ground (hereinafter “G real estate”) owned by F and E while implementing the instant loans Nos. 1 and 2 on December 13, 2007.

On March 18, 201, with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “real estate No. 1”) No. 1, which was owned by F while executing loan Nos. 3 and 4 of this case, on March 18, 2011, the National Bank completed the registration of creation of a neighboring real estate set forth in the separate sheet No. 1,50,000,000 with respect to the registration of creation of a mortgage on March 18, 201, and the debtor set forth in the separate sheet No. 2 with respect to the real estate set forth in the separate sheet No. 1,50,000 with respect to the registration of creation of a mortgage on March 18, 201, the National Bank of Korea completed the registration of creation of a mortgage on each of the real estate set forth in the separate sheet No. 1,50,000,000, and the debtor No. 3 of this case with respect to each of the above real estate set forth in the separate sheet No. 2.

arrow