1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the interest of KRW 30,000,000 per annum and the due date for repayment on November 25, 2012, and that the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the interest of KRW 30,000,000 and the delay damages. Thus, if the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 30,000 to the foreign exchange bank account of KRW 30,00,000 to the foreign exchange bank account of October 15, 2012. The Plaintiff was deemed to have been in a marital relationship with the Defendant at the time, but it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant borrowed the said money from the Plaintiff solely on these facts, and there is no other evidence to support this otherwise.

(o) In addition, if the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement in Eul evidence No. 4, the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff lent the above money to Eul in the Suwon District Court 2013 Ma105138, individual rehabilitation case No. 20138, the plaintiff reported his claim. In addition, the plaintiff seems to have asserted that the plaintiff offered the above money to the defendant who is a common borrower and C. In addition, if the purport of the whole argument is added to the statement in Eul evidence No. 3, the plaintiff decided to borrow 30 million won from the plaintiff on October 15, 2012 as the maturity date of repayment on November 25, 2012, and then the plaintiff did not receive 30,000,000 won ("the loan of this case" or "the loan of this case") with the above loan of this case, and the plaintiff did not receive 30,000,000 won from the plaintiff as the above loan of this case under the name of the defendant No. 213,21,21,201,21,21.