1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. Of the land size of 197 square meters in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Plaintiffs are within the line between 1 to 4, and 1.

1. The claim for restitution following the termination of the lease of the cause of the delay in rent, and the claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent and the rent. 2. The main point of the dispute against the Defendants is that, with the belief of the oral promise that the renewal is guaranteed until redevelopment is conducted, the buildings with many defects are repaired, excessive rent was paid and used, and that the claim for the termination is unjust.

It is insufficient to recognize that even if the Plaintiff’s expression was made, such as the Plaintiff’s assertion by the Defendants, it would not refuse to renew, barring special circumstances, and that it would not be terminated despite the fact that the Plaintiff’s refusal to renew is not made.

A dispute shall have no merit.

3. The claim for conclusion is reasonable.