beta
Text
1. As to KRW 2,220,842,983 and KRW 2,209,94,626 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall start from June 24, 2017 to August 22, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On November 17, 2014 and June 11, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a guarantee insurance contract with the insured Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) with the Administrator of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration as follows. In the event of an insured incident due to a non-party company’s nonperformance at the time, the Plaintiff paid the insured amount to the insured, the non-party company shall immediately pay the insurance amount to the Plaintiff, but if delay occurs, the non-party company shall pay the insurance amount to the Plaintiff by adding damages for delay at the rate applied by the Plaintiff from the day after the date of payment of the insurance
1) The performance (contract) guarantee insurance contract (hereinafter “No. 1 insurance contract”).
() The name of the main contract: The deposit rate of KRW 9,720,613,00 from November 17, 2014 to October 31, 202 of the contract period of the foregoing paragraph equipment: 10% insurance details: the insurance contract amount of KRW 972,061,30: the insurance period of the contract under the supply contract: the contract amount of KRW 972,061,30: the contract amount of the contract under the supply contract: the name of the main contract under the guarantee insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as “second-class insurance contract”): the purchase contract period of Grade 9,720,613,00,000,000: the first insurance amount of KRW 30,000: the insurance contract period of Grade 1; the first insurance contract period of KRW 20,50,000; the first insurance amount of KRW 25,000,000; the insurance amount of KRW 16,015.
B. After that, the Plaintiff changed the content of the second insurance contract with the non-party company twice. The final change is as follows.
Amount of insurance coverage: the insurance period of KRW 1,699,69,390: June 11, 2015 to October 11, 2016.
The defendant, who is the representative of the non-party company, referred to E and E, has jointly and severally guaranteed the debt owed by the non-party company to the plaintiff due to each guarantee insurance contract above.
The defendant asserts that he did not stand a joint and several surety, but the defendant.