logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.08 2017가합102857
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

C 17 years of age D was 18 years of age, E, F, and G, and E was 19 years of age as son, H, I, and J as son.

H adopted 20 years old K, 21 years old L, 22 years old L, 22 years old L, and 22 years old M as above L, as he did not produce children, H adopted 23 years old son among the five children of N, who were born.

If this is expressed, it shall be as follows:

The adoption P, Q, R, S, and T Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant clan”) has participated in the adoption P, Q, R, and N as a clan member in the E 18-year-old D 19-year-old E F 19-year-old 20-year-old L 21-year-old L L 22-year-old L 23-year-old L.

Meanwhile, separate from the defendant clan, there is a “U clan” consisting of only N's descendants.

In the past, according to the resolution of the general meeting of the clan on November 2009, the name of the defendant clan was unified with the name of "B", "A", and "V".

W, who filed a lawsuit in this case as the plaintiff's representative, performed the duties of the chairperson of the defendant clan from the ordinary meeting of the defendant clan on December 10, 2010 to December 13, 2014. On December 13, 2014, X elected as the chairperson at the ordinary meeting of the defendant clan on December 13, 2014, and on April 28, 2015, "the defendant clan is "a sunken clan" composed of "M" descendants of "M" with "M" as the representative of "M" while U clan is a "n's clan" composed of "N," and the two clans are distinct from the beginning of the above clans, and therefore, members of the U clan were not members of the defendant clan who participated in U's general meeting of the members of the defendant clan, and thus, the plaintiff's lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of the general meeting of the defendant clan on December 13, 2014 is not the plaintiff's "N" of the defendant clan.

arrow