A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

피고인은 2012. 8. 31. 12:25경 강원 양구군 양구읍 고대리에 있는 한반도섬 입구 앞 도로에서 B 코란도디젤-훼미리9 승용차를 운전하다가 도로 오른쪽의 콘크리트 방호벽을 들이받아 승용차가 왼쪽으로 전도되는 교통사고를 발생시킨 뒤 같은 날 13:01경 강원도 양구군 C에 있는 양구경찰서 D파출소에서, 위 파출소 소속 경사 E으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 그 때부터 같은 날 13:32경까지 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받고도, 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하고 음주운전사실을 눈감아 달라고 말하며 음주측정기를 손으로 밀어내는 등의 방법으로 이를 회피하여 경찰공무원의 측정에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to attach reports on the current status of a drinking driver, to attaching field photographs, and to photographs refusing to measure drinking);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (the consideration in favor of the reasons for sentencing below);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., when considering the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime in spite of the fact that he/she had been punished twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (refluence of noise measurement), it should be strictly punished, but the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, and that the defendant is subject to criminal punishment other than a fine due to the same criminal act.