All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. According to Defendant A’s statement, etc., the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged is recognized.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. Prior to Defendant B’s passing away, the Defendant first saw the Victim’s arms and scambling the Victim’s arms, and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have a ground to deny illegality.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that judged the defendant not guilty due to the dismissal of illegality is erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. Determination

A. Determination of misunderstanding the facts against Defendant A: (a) The summary of the facts charged against Defendant A and the victim, who is the victim, have been disputed with the money borrowed from the Defendant on January 3, 2014. At around 13:25, the Defendant: (b) on the grounds that the Defendant’s operation on the Seo-gu F and the first floor was about 9:0, the Defendant: (c) on the ground that the victim was boomed with the victim on the ground that the victim was frighten; and (d) on the ground that the victim was fright with the victim, the victim was pushed up for about 4 weeks of medical treatment; (b) the lower court’s judgment and the trial court’s evidence duly adopted and examined, and (c) the Defendant stated that there was no public concern in B from the investigation agency to the trial court; (d) the first time, the police officer’s statement prepared and submitted to the police, stating that the Defendant was frightd with the victim’s fright and frightd with the Defendant’s wall.