1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,912,616 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 23, 2019 to August 13, 2020.

1. From February 18, 2019, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the “C Hospital” operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and hospitalized treatment after being hospitalized.

On February 23, 2019, at the shower room of the instant hospital around 20:30 on February 23, 2019, the Plaintiff sustained 'the wind that has been cut off to the water flag of the corridor outside the shower room'. The Plaintiff sustained 'the wind that has been cut off to the water flag of the corridor outside the shower room'.

(hereinafter “instant accident”. Meanwhile, on the floor of the corridor near the entrance of a shower room in which the instant accident occurred, there was no sub-market for the removal of water and the prevention of collapse, etc., and there was no notice to urge the patients to pay attention, etc., and according to Article 11 of the Agreement on Entrustment Management of the United States of America concerning the instant hospital concluded between the Defendant and Nonparty D, working hours of Saturdays workers from 07:0 to 12:00, an accident occurred.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, Eul evidence 1-4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. We examine the occurrence of liability for damages and the limitation of liability. The hospital of this case is a place where patients with inconvenience such as the plaintiff live in the entrance of the shower room, and the corridor near the shower room is likely to extinguish by the shower room and the patient's body or body. As such, the defendant, as the manager of the hospital of this case, has installed a sign for removing water from the above corridor and preventing the collapse of the patient, or installed a sign for removing water from the above corridor and at any time during the shower room, from time to time during the shower room (the fact that the defendant was in charge of cleaning the cleaning service company cannot be deemed to have fulfilled the duty of protective measures required by social norms).