The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, who recognized all of the crimes, is against the dignity of the Defendant.

It seems that the public disorder suffered by the defendant has influenced the crime of this case to a certain extent.

Such circumstances are favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment for a crime of the same kind, and among them, the criminal records of imprisonment are also several times.

In particular, the Defendant committed the crime of fraud of the same type as the instant case, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment on November 9, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was completed on July 9, 2017, and there was no long time for the Defendant to commit the instant crime against many victims in many places, such as Seoul, Netcheon, Mining, and Cheongju.

The victims did not agree with the victims and did not recover from the damage.

Such circumstances are disadvantageous to the defendant.

The lower court seems to have sentenced to one year of imprisonment, which is the lowest of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee (one year to two years), taking into account the favorable or unfavorable circumstances of the Defendant.

When comprehensively considering the conditions of sentencing, the sentencing decision of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of its discretion in light of the sentencing criteria, the sentencing decision of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of its discretion.

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that it is unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are considered, the sentence of the court below shall be proper and too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.