The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the District Court for fraud, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on August 29, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

Although the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, on December 9, 2013, at around 21:30, the Defendant obtained the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the taxi fee by failing to pay KRW 20,000 after boarding a C cab operated by the victim B and arriving in front of the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-dong 683, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, to pay the taxi fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Before ruling, a receipt of taxi charges; Application of three copies of the judgment; and

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (Consideration with the case of judgment at the same time as the judgment of fraud, etc. is concluded);