logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2016.08.11 2016고단96
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) sought a variety of statements from the victim C (hereinafter “B”) located in the South Heung-gun, the South and North Korea, for the reason that there was a rumor to the effect that “the victim would not be able to answer with the Defendant” to the person E prior to the date, and that “the victim would not be able to answer with the Defendant.” (b) 13:30 on June 7, 2016.

“Along with sound, the victim’s smartphones owned by the victim on the table was laid up on the floor, and a approximately KRW 129,000 of the repair cost was damaged by the said smartphones.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, at the above place, and at the 112 report and sent to the scene, as a public official of the police box belonging to the police box of the Heungung Police Station, “whether or not

B. The police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported by a police official by making the 110th rank of the slope G one time in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (referring to attaching a check of the repair cost of a Handphone);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment / [the scope of recommending punishment ] the basic area of the first type of crime (Interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) (from June to January 4) (the scope of recommending punishment / [the scope of recommending punishment / [the range of recommending punishment ] the mitigation area (one to June 6), the mitigation area (one (property damage, etc.) (one to June), the mitigation area (one to June), the mitigation area of punishment / the final sentencing scope due to the aggravation of punishment by the aggravation of punishment: Six months to one year and seven months [the decision of sentencing] disadvantageous: the defendant was punished several times for the same kind of crime.

arrow