A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 15, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the said apartment management office by cutting off the vehicle blocking machine installed in the front door of the apartment house C, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and entering into the situation where it is impossible to enter a non-resident’s vehicle. However, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the said apartment management office so that the repair cost would amount to KRW 140,000,000 by cutting off the vehicle with a lush hand three times.

2. From October 15, 2017, around 16:50 on October 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for the same reason at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1); and (b) allowed the Defendant to board 112 patrols to go to the nearby D area.

The Defendant “I Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dob Dok

“To avoid getting on the patrol vehicle while carrying the Defendant on the patrol vehicle, the victim E, who is the police officer belonging to the said patrol vehicle, carrying the Defendant on the patrol vehicle, has broken off the right part of the victim E, who is the police officer belonging to the said patrol vehicle, once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers who have conducted prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, caused the victim to “a failure to identify the details of the shoulder and the above arms” which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Field photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination of the Defendant’s mental disorder claim under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation is various, including the background leading up to the crime acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the means and method of the crime, and the Defendant’s behavior before and after the crime.