logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2019.07.15 2019고단26 (1)
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A In four months of imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant D shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who commits a public offering by defendant C, E, or F shall file an application for permission by unlawful means, such as submitting a forged or altered document, etc. as evidentiary materials in connection with an application for permission to change the status of stay under the Immigration Control Act, or submitting an application stating false facts;

Defendant

C and F both enter the Republic of Korea on August 15, 2017 as a foreigner of Indian nationality and on a short-term visa (C-3-4) visa, respectively. On November 13, 2017, foreigners who entered Korea as visa visa passed the expiration date of the period of stay, and upon application for refugee, foreigners who entered Korea as visa visa were in accordance with the Refugee Act and were aware of the fact that they can legally stay in a foreign registration certificate by changing their status of stay to other (G-1) upon receipt under the Refugee Act.

Defendant

C and F had been residing in G corporation as a broker from around August 2017, while working in G corporation with E, and entered into a separate lease contract. However, inasmuch as a lease contract was needed in order to apply for a change of status of stay as refugee applicant, it was demanded that E prepare a lease contract at a place where the location is unknown on October 2017. The request that E “necessary to extend the period of non-resident stay” was made. Accordingly, if the Defendant prepares a lease contract on the H room in which he actually resides, it is anticipated that the act of arranging the employment of foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn that he/she is able to engage in job-seeking activities would be dismissed, and that he/she would be able to prepare a false lease contract upon the request of Defendant C and F.

Accordingly, Defendant E calls the “J”, a real estate broker, to inform Defendant C and F of the personal information of Defendant C and F at a place where the location on October 23, 2017 is unknown, and the fact that Defendant C and F have leased the K Building L from Defendant C and F racing.

arrow