The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was unable to accurately memory the situation at the time, filed the instant complaint on the ground that the police officer confirmed the closed circuit (CCTV) video (hereinafter “video”) and considered that the Defendant was pushed the Defendant.

경찰관이 피고인의 팔짱을 끼고 밀고 들어가면서 실제로 밀었을 가능성도 있다.

The Defendant expressed that the police officer, while under the influence of alcohol, was unbrupted to go beyond the police officer’s proper view, and the situation at the time is merely exaggeration of the situation. (B) The punishment of the lower court is heavier than that of the lower court.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence examined by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal doctrine, the following facts and circumstances are acknowledged.

Based on this, it can be recognized that the accusation of this case constitutes a false accusation, and that it constitutes a false accusation.

In light of the contents of the complaint, it is difficult to see that the simple exaggeration is unreasonable.

1) 피해자 F, G는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서, ‘ 피고인을 공무집행 방해의 현행범으로 체포하였으나 피고인이 연행을 거부하여 피고 인의 등 뒤로 수갑을 채워 오른쪽 팔은 F 가, 왼쪽 팔은 G가 팔짱을 끼고 형사계로 연행하는 도중 서초 경찰서 현관 로비 당직 근무자 데스크 앞을 지날 때 갑자기 피고인이 고의로 오른쪽에서 걷던 피해자 F의 왼쪽 발목 부위를 강하게 발로 차 그 충격으로 피고인이 몸이 중심을 잃고 앞으로 넘어지면서 양쪽에서 팔짱을 끼고 있던 경찰관들이 함께 앞으로 넘어지게 되어 피고인의 무릎과 얼굴이 로비 바닥에 부딪치게 되었다.

“Alongly and consistently speaking.”

2) At the time of the instant case, as the Defendant asserts, the Defendant was sealed by F, G with shoulder and arms, etc.