Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a MF6 car.

On April 19, 2017, the Defendant changed the two lanes from the two lanes, which are the two lanes, to the one-lane modern apartment, in the direction of the shooting distance, from the other hand, while driving from the other hand, the two lanes to the other.

At the time, at night, the victim C(n, 37 years old) was driving on the one lane, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to change the vehicle by operating a direction before and after the change of the lane to give prior notice of the change of the route to the person engaged in driving service, and considering the traffic situation at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the car line to the left-hand side, and received the front gate of the said SM6 car in front of the right-hand side after the left-hand side of the said SM6 car and proceeding one lane in the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence destroyed and damaged the above Aburged car to the extent equivalent to KRW 700,000,000, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report (1) (2), vehicle and field pictures, estimates, investigation reports (related to the analysis of cream records of victims and Defendant-driving Vehicles);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts and the selective punishment (a) ( even though the defendant denies the facts charged by an investigative agency, this court recognizes the facts charged and reflects the fact that the defendant, although the defendant denies the facts charged, is taking into account the fact that the defendant has long been subject to comprehensive insurance, and that the defendant has no history of criminal punishment other than that of a relatively minor fine before being imposed on a long time);

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1.