logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.27 2016가합71009
사해행위취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D and E around October 201, 2001, including the conclusion of a partnership agreement and the process of the establishment of the Defendant Company, etc.

(2) On November 12, 2001, D and E agreed not to raise any objection to the instant golf practice range business on December 29, 2001 after completing the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of E with respect to the instant golf practice range on August 1, 2001, by making one-half of all the expenses including the acquisition cost and the operating cost, and by making one-half of each interest generated. Accordingly, D and E agreed not to raise any objection to the instant golf practice range business on August 3, 2009, even if they independently sell their shares as the owner of the instant golf practice range building and its subsidiary facilities, M and B Co., Ltd.

After that, on April 22, 2011, E sold to C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) one-half percent of the total price for the instant golf driving range business to KRW 600 million. On April 25, 2011, E completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant golf driving range building in C in April 25, 201, and C thereafter operated the instant golf driving range business after performing the test and repair of the instant golf driving range building.

3. On July 201, when a fire occurs in the building of the instant golf driving range, and N, O, P, N, and O have been destroyed, C entered into a new construction contract with the permission for the construction of a golf driving range on February 15, 2012, including N, P, and P, G, and P, G, including G, G, and P, G, and P, which were approved by the Goung-gu Office on February 15, 201.

Then, in the separate sheet.

arrow