[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B had a claim amounting to approximately KRW 70 million against the victim C, but the victim C did not pay the above claim. Defendant C sent text messages, etc. to the husband of the above victim C and the above party C, who is the Defendant’s debt, to the above victim C, who is the Defendant’s debt.

In order to receive the above claims from the victims, they were born.

(a) No person shall assault, threaten, arrest, or detain a debtor or his/her related person to commit a crime against victim C, or commit a debt collection act using a deceptive scheme or force against him/her;

Nevertheless, on April 6, 2016, the Defendant sent the text message “I do not draw up, I do so, I die, I die, I die, I am her her husband, I am her husband, I am her husband, and I am her husband, I am her husband, I am her husband, I am her husband, and I am her husband until 8 years before her debt collection act by threatening the debt holder to collect the debt.”

From that time to May 19, 2016, Defendant 1 sent text messages to the victim 13 times in total, such as (i) the list of offenses in attached Form No. 1.

By intimidation, the act of collecting claims was conducted.

(b) A person liable to collect claims against victims D shall not visit persons related to his/her obligations or make persons reach words, letters, sound, image, or things, except where he/she seeks to inquire of the debtor's whereabouts, contact information, methods of identifying the debtor's whereabouts, etc. for the collection of claims;

Nevertheless, at around April 28, 2016, the Defendant sent a written message to D, who is the husband of the debtor C, to the victim D, who was the husband of the debtor C at the time of Ansan-si around April 28, 2016 and sent the text message to the victim five times in total, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table (2) from that time to May 3, 2016.

In this regard, the defendant comments on the victim, who is a related person in relation to the obligation.