logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.06.21 2015가단115999
건물명도
Text

1. Defendant B delivers to the Plaintiff the second floor office 214.12 square meters among the buildings listed in the attached list, and KRW 8,466,658 and KRW 8,468.

Reasons

1. Part as to Defendant B

A. On November 10, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract between Defendant B and Defendant B with the size of 214.12 square meters of the second floor office among the buildings listed in the attached Table as follows: KRW 15,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,100,000 ( separate tax), and the lease period of November 10, 201 to November 10, 201. (2) The Defendant B did not pay the monthly rent only from September 11, 2014 to September 10, 2012.

3) Defendant B’s monthly rent in arrears by April 21, 2016 is KRW 23,466,658 in total, and the unpaid monthly rent is KRW 8,46,658 in excess of KRW 15,000 in the above lease agreement even after deducting the deposit amount of KRW 15,00,000 in the lease agreement. Defendant B kept a door without operating the current PC.

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Part as to Defendant C

A. Basic facts 1) On June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with Defendant C on the premise that the lessee would waive the right of lease during the period from August 1, 2012 to August 1, 2014, the lessee shall be deemed to have paid only the monthly rent until January 31, 2015, and the Defendant C did not pay as the monthly rent from February 1, 2015 to February 1, 2015.

3) Defendant C’s monthly rent in arrears by April 21, 2016 is KRW 14,53,000, and the unpaid monthly rent is KRW 2,553,000,000 after deducting the lease deposit amount of KRW 12,00,000. 4) The Plaintiff intended to newly construct the building listed in the separate sheet (the use approval was obtained on October 29, 1975) on the ground that the building listed in the separate sheet (the use approval was obtained on October 29, 1975) was worn out. In addition, Defendant C’s notice of the termination of the lease on the ground of the delayed rent was served as a duplicate of the instant complaint.

5. As to the building indicated in the separate sheet of this case

arrow