The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On December 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) visited the NAC, composed of the occupants of the apartment apartment B at the Geung-si, Gung-si, Gung-si, Gung-si; and (b) on the bulletin board of the place “B, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S. and U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S.

Therefore, I tried to issue this note.

Whether you are able to come into us, such as Simra, and are making the last rush and rush, such as E.

Ebbbags

Notice to the effect that "" was made, and in the form of comments comments comments made by the comments made by the comments made at around 17:00 the same day.

The representative of the tenant who files a complaint against the occupants, which is very important.

A notice was posted to the effect that “” was “.

Accordingly, the Defendant insultd the victim D who is the representative of the occupant of the above apartment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

In such a case, the victim D's withdrawal of the complaint against the defendant on May 16, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case, is obvious in the records. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.