logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.11.03 2016고단1029
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:10 on June 18, 2016, the Defendants were unable to avoid disturbance in “E” parking lots located in Sinpo City D, on the ground that the victim F (year 43) and the victim G (year 42) were satisfing in excess of his age table table, Defendant A was able to take four times the victim F face at drinking, followed the victim F’s side satisf, followed up two times the victim F’s side satisf, and Defendant B was 4 times the victim F’s side satf, and Defendant B prevented the victim G from committing the above assault, and Defendant A was 7 times the victim G face as drinking.

As a result, the defendants jointly suffered from the injury of the victim F, such as duplic s fages, which affected the two cupages that require more than five weeks of medical treatment, and the victim G suffered from the injury, such as damage of the face requiring two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each damaged part photograph, investigation report (Attachment to a medical certificate for injury);

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Violence, etc., the applicable law of criminal facts, the punishment of selective punishment, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, that there was a negligence that caused the victim's injury, that there was no penalty force exceeding the fine due to violence, that there was no penalty force exceeding the fine due to violence, and that there was

arrow