logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단5539
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court), and on March 11, 2014, a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a fine for the same crime at the same court, respectively.

around 12:50 on December 5, 2017, the Defendant driven a C-wing Corpon under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.237% from the 250 meters away from the 250-lane to the front road of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 78-ro 213-ro 78, tin-gu, tin-ro 1, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-ro 459-21-ro 1.

around 12:40 on December 11, 2017, the Defendant driven a Cwon-III cargo vehicle with approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.150% from the 50m section of blood until vain vain, located in the same Gu from the front of “Tin, Tin,” “Tin,” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu-gu 1 Dong-gu, to the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 5539"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. A statement of the circumstances of the driver at the main place of business: "2018 Highest 276";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (a summary order accompanied by summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, and the choice of a penalty;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account the fact that the instant crime has been committed repeatedly despite the history of punishment several times due to driving of alcohol for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation, including the fact that the instant crime has been committed repeatedly, the higher drinking value, the fact that the person has not been sentenced to imprisonment due to driving of alcohol, the fact that the person is being treated with

arrow