A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2012, the Defendant, at the “E” office for the victim’s “E” office located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, as the executive officers of the advanced livestock farming cooperative, concluded that the Defendant was the victim as if the Defendant was a member of the advanced livestock farming cooperative. “In this time, the head of the site office of the warehouse construction work located in Yangyang-gun, which is located in the advanced livestock farming cooperative at this time, was entrusted with the same time, and changed the access road construction work that is to be paid immediately after the completion of the construction. This Corporation made a false statement to the effect that the construction cost is immediately paid without a mold, and if well, the secondary construction works conducted by the agricultural cooperative will also be awarded to the effect that the payment would be made. As such, the payment of money would be made, the tax invoice will be issued in advance.

However, the defendant was not the executive director or the head of the field office of the above farming cooperative, and the above construction was contracted by the defendant, not the defendant directly operated by the farming cooperative, and the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price in full immediately after the construction, or to additionally contract the second construction even after receiving access road from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received access roads to the construction site from the victim, and acquired approximately KRW 14,250,000,00 from the victim, for property benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to petition for complaint and accompanying documents;

1. It is inevitable to sentence a corresponding sentence in light of the fact that the Defendant, who has the same criminal history as the Defendant once again commits the instant crime, such as the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, Article 347(1) of the selective sentencing of imprisonment, and the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the reason of criminal punishment, again

The Criminal Act, such as the confession and reflection of a crime, is committed by the defendant.