(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.04.23 2020노59 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.04.23 2020노59

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)

Text

The judgment below

The part of the defendant D against the defendant is reversed.

Defendant

D. A person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

1. Of the facts charged against Defendant E, the lower court found Defendant E guilty of assault in the same facts charged within the scope of the same charges while rendering a judgment of not guilty on the grounds of the judgment. Defendant E and the prosecutor appealed only on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing only for the aforementioned guilty portion, and thus, the part on acquittal of the reasons for which the prosecutor did not appeal was not appealed from the trial but was in fact relieved from the object of attack and defense between the parties.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below was excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court, and the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the conviction of the defendants of this court.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A, B, C, and E [the Defendant A (ten months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete a program to prevent sexual traffic brokerage, 3 years of order to restrict employment, 40 hours of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to prevent sexual traffic brokerage, 3 years of order to restrict employment], Defendant C (one year of imprisonment, short-term 10 months of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete a program to prevent sexual traffic brokerage, 40 hours of order to restrict employment, 3 years of order to restrict employment), Defendant E (one year of imprisonment, 40 hours of order to complete a program to prevent sexual traffic brokerage, 3 years of order to restrict employment)] are too unreasonable.

B. The public prosecutor's sentence [the defendant A (the imprisonment, the 10-month period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period of imprisonment, the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period, the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 120-hour period of the suspension of execution, the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 10-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 40-hour period of the 0-day period of the 0-day period of the 0-day period

유사 판례

-부산고등법원 2021.03.25 2020노582

-서울고등법원 2017.11.02 2017노2207

-인천지방법원 2020.04.17 2020노120

-인천지방법원 2019.06.14 2019노1131

-부산고등법원 2019.10.17 2019노219