beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s determination on the unfair argument of sentencing by both parties, and where the lower court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it should be respected (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In this case, there is no particular change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s determination on the grounds that the new materials of sentencing were not submitted in the instant case
In addition, the instant case committed an indecent act against the victim E who was on the way by the defendant and the person requesting the attachment order (hereinafter "the defendant"), and committed an indecent act against the defendant, and committed an indecent act against the defendant by force after several months, and committed an indecent act against the victim H and I demanding the payment of the compensation, and committed an indecent act against the victim H and I, and arrested him as an offender in the act of committing an offense, and it is not good that the crime is committed. The instant case, even if the victims received a considerable mental shock from the victims, the defendant did not receive a letter from the victims, and even if there was a history of punishment due to fraud in the past, the defendant committed the instant fraud. The Defendant all led to the confession and rebuttal of the instant crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the victimJ of the fraud did not want to receive compensation for damages from the defendant, and the sentencing conditions and the sentencing conditions shown in the record and pleadings, as well as the punishment conditions in favor of the defendant.
shall not be deemed to exist.
All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor that the sentencing of the court below is unfair are rejected.
2. In light of the prosecutor’s argument regarding the prosecutor’s assertion on the motion for attachment order request, the motive and background of the instant crime, the result of assessing the Defendant’s risk of recidivism, and the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, etc., the circumstance asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal is