logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.10.11 2013고합61
변호사법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On August 3, 2010, the summary of the facts charged D loaned KRW 5 billion to G, which was the largest shareholder of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), who was known through the introduction of E, as the price for F’s capital increase, around August 3, 2010. G, around September 15, 2010, deducted KRW 2.14 billion out of F’s capital from F and paid the down payment (2 billion won) to E in the form of personal lending to E.

D, E, and G agreed to treat KRW 2,140,00,000 paid as the I's down payment by lending from D to E of the above KRW 5,00,000,000 from D, when around January 201.

G around May 201, as well as the above KRW 2.14 billion, was suspected of embezzlement of the above corporate funds, and was investigated at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in Seoul. D and E also under the suspicion of accomplice who participated in G embezzlement, and was investigated into the suspect status by the above prosecutor's office.

(Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office 201-Type 40617, 62964, 64315). D statements to the effect that E was aware of the fact of embezzlement from the special department of the Busan District Prosecutors' Office after September 2009, when investigating the source of funds of the above 5 billion won that the prosecutor lent to G, in around 2008, E was suspected of embezzlement of the J's funds of KRW 38.3 billion that it operated. However, E who became aware of such fact in the course of investigating the instant case, unlike this part of the facts charged, D statements to the effect that it was aware of its own fact of embezzlement from September 209, when it was investigated as embezzlement by the special department of the Busan District Prosecutors' Office.

In collusion with the defendant, the prosecutorial investigator in charge of the investigation office in charge of the above case in collusion with the defendant would make D's J fund embezzlement case not to be carried out.

Defendant and E, according to the above public invitation, around May 28, 201, there is a person who is well aware of the investigator in charge of the prosecution's office in the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City K.

through this person.

arrow