logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고정136
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on August 26, 2009, issued a certificate of report on a communications sales business from the Hongcheon-gun on the issuance of a certificate, is a person who operates a “C”, which is a food and processed mail order company, in Hongcheon-gun B.

No one shall indicate or advertise that the name, manufacturing method, quality and nutrition labelling, genetically modified foods, etc. and food history tracking and management labelling of foods, etc. with the content that such foods, etc. have efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that such foods, etc. may be mistaken for or confused as medicine or health functional foods.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on January 2015, on the Internet homepage of the Defendant’s management website for the purpose of selling food supplied by HT from HT, was certified as having efficacy and effect on the prevention and treatment of diseases by the food and drug safety wife or by any other reliable institution recognized by the State, for the purpose of the Defendant’s operation, the Defendant: (a) although he/she was not certified as having efficacy and effect on the development of food and drug safety wife or by any other institution with public confidence recognized by the State; (b) the promotion of development of reproductive institutions and the formation of sperm; (c) the function control and cryp; (d) Cyp: strong sterilization and rhem effect; (c) the effect and recovery of such disease; (d) the improvement of the cryposis; (e) the suppression of physical aging; (e) the suppression of cryposis; (e) the improvement of crypology; (e) the improvement of cryposis; (e) the suppression of 1 pulic therapy and treatment effect of cancer;

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes governing contents of Internet advertisement;

1. Article 94 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 94 of the Food Sanitation Act;

arrow