Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

From May 2017, the Defendant started with the victim B (e.g., 49 years of age) from around 49 years of age, and had frequent fighting incidents due to differences in the nature of around July of the same year, and had the victim informed unilaterally from the victim of the fighting, and had the remainder of the fighting with which he had not been able to do so.

No one shall allow anyone to repeatedly reach the other party any code, language, etc. that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.

On August 9, 2017, at around 06:44, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim’s mobile phone E using his/her mobile phone DNA at the residence of Sejong C.

The Defendant sent the message of obscene and abusive language through the same method 22 times, such as the “crime sight table” in attached Form 1, between around the same month and from around 16.08:32.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to B or F;

1. Domestic investigation report (to attach a list of offenses committed by the victimized person’s obscene or abusive language messages) - The list of offenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing the victim’s obscene or abusive text message to the suspect;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the relevant Article of the Act and Articles 74-7 (1) 3 (Selection of Penalty) of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the crime of this case is very poor in light of the period and frequency of sending the Defendant’s text message, the content of text message, etc.; the Defendant was punished for a non-indicted 1 crime; the Defendant did not agree with the victim; the victimized person wanted to punish the Defendant; and accordingly, the Defendant’s efforts are insufficient to recover damage.