logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.02 2014가합13605
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Each of the instant business agreements and agency business agreements 1) The business of constructing a commercial facility on a daily unit of 849 square meters in Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “instant business”).

Around July 29, 2011, an executive company, a separate co-ownership corporation, a separate co-ownership corporation (hereinafter “a separate co-ownership”), and an indication of the person involved in the case, a stock company, is omitted when indicating the person involved in the case.

(i)a project agreement and agency contract to which the contractor is a party, a sub-contractor, a sub-contractor, a sub-contractor, a representative trust company, a defendant, a lending financial institution, NFF as a party and an agency contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant first project agreement and agency contract”);

arrow