1. In accordance with the purport of the claim that was changed in exchange from the trial, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 520,800,895.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for modification as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the main text of Article 420

Part 2, Part 13 amended "KF" in Part 13 to "KF Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the merger"), and revised to "the defendant, hereinafter referred to as "the defendant, referring to the merger before and after the merger; hereinafter referred to as "the defendant, referring to the merger before and after the merger")," and "KF," in the part 2, 16 to 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, and 5

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff and the defendant made an agency contract around January 15, 2007, and entered into an agreement on the payment of royalties management fees and policy fees for 3Gs, and the defendant made an additional agreement on the fee agreement and the fee for 2Gs around April 2007, and around April 2007, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement on the fee for the management fees for 3Gs. The above 3G fee agreement does not include matters concerning royalties management fees and policy fees for the subscribers to the corporation and the organization, but the plaintiff and the defendant did not enter into an express or implied agreement on the payment of royalties management fees and policy fees for 3G new subscribers including new subscribers recruited in accordance with the corporation and organization's special name, from around 200 to around 208 (the claim related to the policy fees for the target payment) to the plaintiff, notwithstanding the above claim related to the subsidy payment or the subsidy payment from around 2007.