The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was stolen by the Defendant, from around 14:00 on December 11, 2013 to around 16:00 the following day, the sum of market prices, including two water purifiers, one audio device, one electric tools, one chain block, ten chain, and one tools set, which are kept in the instant factory ma in order for the Victim E to take directors within the “D” factory located in the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

2. The court stated in this court that “F was permitted the Defendant to take the equipment behind the D factory building on December 11, 2013, at around 12:00, when he was requested to repair the equipment from E, it was in the factory after repairing the equipment for at least two hours at D factory, and between them, the Defendant sent three times the Defendant who had been working in the D factory with a wheeled Audio and a factory on at least two hours, and it did not see whether the Defendant was loaded in the cargo partitions of the son,” and the Victim E only allowed the Defendant to take the equipment behind the D factory building on December 11, 2013. However, in full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the evidence alone does not have any reasonable evidence to prove that the Defendant was in possession of the victim and the Eudio, etc., and there is no other evidence to prove that the Defendant did not have any other evidence to the extent that the Defendant had any other evidence to prove the facts charged in this case.

3. According to the conclusion of the judgment, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, and thus, the defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325