logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고정313
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 19, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime such as special injury at the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 27, 2018.

[2] Around August 25, 2017, the Defendant operated a vehicle with D, which is a dangerous object in the front distance of C at Sejong-si, and operated a vehicle with D, which is a dangerous object in the front distance of C at Sejong-si, and threatened the victim with the side of the victim who was carrying out an advertising winding line.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The withdrawal of the witness examination protocol from the date to the witness B (the fifth public trial);

1. Viewing and viewing CCTV images;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and reporting of the previous convictions before and after the disposition (Seoul District Court 2017 High Court 2017 High Court 3219 High Court hereinafter referred to as "the defendant denies the intention of special intimidation").

According to the above evidence, the Defendant appears to have abused the victim on June 13, 2017, on the ground that the victim did not act in good faith with respect to his/her special injury case, and was committed on August 25, 2017 by driving a vehicle, which is a dangerous object to be used in doing harm to the body of a person on August 25, 2017, on the ground that he/she did not act in good faith with respect to his/her special injury case, and led to an attitude that would cause harm to the body of the victim.

The decision is judged.

At the time, there seems to have been motives to commit a special intimidation for the above reasons.

In the absence of such motive for the defendant, it seems that there is no reason for the defendant to spread to the victim as soon as possible at a rapid speed.

In light of the defendant's attitude of such act, the words and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the defendant is the defendant.

arrow