A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2014, the Defendant was commissioned to issue a registration certificate of automobile management business from C, a member of B, while he/she served as a secretary of “B,” a group of automobile management companies, which is a group of automobile management companies.

However, when the Defendant delayed the issuance of a certificate of registration due to personal reasons, such as being recommended to resign from B D at the time and did not immediately handle it, and as a result, was urged to issue a certificate of registration from C. Around September 2014, the Defendant copied a copy of another motor vehicle management business registration certificate kept in his/her custody without authority for the purpose of exercising it at the office B located in the Gu Government-Si, Gu, and copied it in the form of “F”, “C (G)”, “Seoul-do Macheon-si, Gyeonggi-do Ha”, and “Seoul Macheon-si, 2014” using a computer screen, copied each of the above parts in the knife, and copied it in the form of “title”, “name (type of business),” “name (representative),” “location (location)”, “type of business”, “place of business”, and “place of business”.

As a result, the defendant forged a certificate of registration of motor vehicle management business in the name of the Macheon Market, which is an official document.

2. The Defendant exercised a forged public document by transmitting to C a certificate of registration of automobile management business that was forged at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, by facsimile as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Registration certificate of automobile management business;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a summary of statement by telephone);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommending punishment) shall be the same as the official document forgery, alteration, etc.