Text
1. Defendant A and C jointly share KRW 56,001,407 to the Plaintiff, as well as the year from February 12, 201 to May 22, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant D (hereinafter “D”), Defendant B is a business entity with the trade name “E”, and Defendant C is a personal business entity with the trade name “F”, respectively.
B. On December 17, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with D to guarantee the payment of corporate purchase funds to a new bank (hereinafter “new bank”) with D by setting the rate of guarantee funds as 80% of its liabilities, and D entered into an agreement with the new bank pursuant to the said credit guarantee agreement.
(c) A corporate purchase financing loan shall be extended in such a manner that, within the agreed lending limit, a loan equivalent to the transaction price is directly paid to the customer from the lending institution when the customer requests the lending institution to collect the sales price, together with a tax invoice issued by the lending institution to
Defendant B and C requested a new bank to collect sales proceeds on the basis of the tax invoice issued to D according to the goods transaction with D. Accordingly, from September 21, 2009 to September 7, 2010 as listed below, the new bank remitted loans of KRW 207,732,80 in total to Defendant B and loans of KRW 63,747,704 in total to Defendant C from August 10, 2010 to August 31, 2010.
Defendant B (E) 19,00,000 on September 21, 2009 September 21, 2009; 32,00,000 on September 30, 200 on October 21, 2009; 4,70,000 on October 28, 209; 5,00 on October 4, 200 on May 27, 200 5, 200 on June 4, 207, 200 on June 30, 200 on June 19, 200, 2000, 30,000 on July 36, 207, 200 on July 27, 200, 200 on July 27, 200, 200, 50,000; 30,000 on August 31, 208, 2008
D. On October 4, 2010, D was treated as poor by Defendant A’s application for individual rehabilitation, and the new bank claimed the Plaintiff to discharge the guaranteed obligation, as D did not repay the above loan obligations.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff.