logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.09 2015가합4808
추심금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 174,49,607 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 8, 2015 to November 9, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 8, 2011, H entered into a contract for construction works between H and the Defendant 1) H is awarded a contract with the Defendant for a new construction work regarding JJ apartment houses that was undertaken at the first cost in Namyang-si, Nam-si (hereinafter “instant construction”) with the cost of construction KRW 864 million (hereinafter “instant construction”).

From that time, the instant construction was carried out. From that time to September 2012, the Defendant paid the instant construction cost of KRW 635 million to H with respect to the instant construction. 2) H completed the construction of the instant construction in order from around 2012 to June 2013 with respect to the said JJ 13 units, and the Nam Yang-ju market was approved for each of the 13 units of the instant construction work of H from November 2012 to June 2013.

B. On February 17, 2014, Plaintiff B received a provisional seizure order of KRW 45,016,560, among the instant claim for the construction cost under the provisional seizure order of KRW 2013Kadan601 among the instant claim for the construction cost under the provisional seizure order of KRW 2013Kadan6041 among the instant claim for the construction cost, and issued a seizure and collection order of KRW 45,016,560 to the Defendant, who is the garnishee on February 19, 2014. (2) The Plaintiff was served on the Defendant on July 16, 2014 with Suwon District Court Branch Branch of KRW 2014Da10153,00,000, KRW 237,605, KRW 5050, KRW 1605, KRW 1605, KRW 2065, KRW 1605, KRW 1605, KRW 2057, KRW 2057, and KRW 1650645.7.7

3. On August 6, 2014, Plaintiff C received a seizure and collection order as to the money until it reaches KRW 2,0120,000 from among the claim for construction price of the instant case that the Plaintiff had against the Defendant as the District Court Decision 2014TT No. 20153, Aug. 6, 2014, and issued the above seizure and collection order.

arrow