logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.16 2018구합62349
건축허가신청반려처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 24, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a construction permit to build a Class 1 neighborhood living facility (retailing store) on the instant land, as the owner of the area B prior to the wife population B (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On October 26, 2017, the Plaintiff received a supplementary notice from the Defendant to submit a written consent to land use from D, the owner of the land adjacent to the instant land, which was “Seoul-si, G-si, the wife C-si,” and submitted the said written consent. (c) On November 201, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the Defendant to the effect that he/she would allow the Defendant to use the instant land as a road on the grounds that the owner of the instant land or his/her heir cannot be found as unknown. On November 30, 2017, the Defendant filed a civil petition with the Defendant to the effect that he/she would allow the Defendant to use the instant land as a road on the grounds that the owner of the instant land or his/her heir is unknown, and on which November 30, 2017, the Defendant need not obtain the consent of the owner to occupy and use the instant land, but the remainder of the instant land not included in E

The plaintiff's response to the purport that "the above civil petition cannot be accepted." D) The plaintiff requested the defendant to re-examine the defendant to the purport that the part of the related land of this case is used as a road, and the defendant on December 8, 2017, "the site of the building is adjacent to the road pursuant to Article 44 of the Building Act," and the land of this case is adjacent to the related land of this case, and therefore, in order to meet the criteria of the road as defined in the Building Act, the land of this case should be incorporated into E in order to meet the criteria of the road as defined in the Building Act. However, since the land of this case is excluded, the designation of the road should be announced with the consent of the interested parties, or the permission to occupy and use the road by entering the road pursuant to

arrow