logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.14 2017나21410
부당이득금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants and Defendant C’s incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs due to an appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the grounds for incidental appeal by defendant C are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if all the evidence presented in the court of first instance are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate. Thus, both the Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants and Defendant C’s incidental appeal are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow