logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018나61857
유류분반환
Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant and the incidental costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C and D (Death of March 3, 2003) had Defendant, E, Plaintiff, and F as their children under the chain.

B. On January 3, 2005, C prepared a written confirmation of will (hereinafter “instant confirmation”) with the following contents, and signed, sealed, and stamped it.

At present, B (Defendant), B (Defendant), and E, third G seems to be a clerical error in “F”.

According to the division to each other and his father A (Plaintiff) has completed money in the past, and his wife A (Plaintiff) transferred all of J (hereinafter referred to as “the real estate of this case” in the attached Table No. 1) to J (Defendant). E has been in the gold-gu I. Since he had a mental disorder, G has failed to make registration due to his mental disorder, J Apartment K (the real estate of this case No. 4 in the attached Table No. 4 in the real estate list; hereinafter referred to as “the real estate of this case”) will be registered in the future, and the number of times is large to all things and the number of punishment is managed.

C. On May 13, 2005, C completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the “donation on May 12, 2005” with respect to the instant real estate No. 1, and on December 5, 2005, on the instant real estate No. 4, due to “the donation on December 3, 2005,” and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on “the sale on April 6, 201” with respect to each of the instant real estate No. 1/2 shares to L and M on April 7, 201.

C. On February 9, 2012, the deceased on February 9, 2012, there are children, E, the plaintiff, and F. F. From around March 7, 1994, F was hospitalized and provided treatment for outpatients under diagnosis of mental fissions. At present, there is no dispute over the facts that there is no dispute over the F.C. 1, A’s evidence Nos. 2, A’s evidence Nos. 3, A’s evidence Nos. 1, 5’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6’s evidence Nos. 1, 1-1, 2, and 1-1, 1-1, 1-2, and 1-1 (a written confirmation is unilaterally favorable to the defendant, and its establishment is established.

arrow