1. The defendant,

A. The delivery of No. 202 from among the buildings located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C is simultaneously the same.

1. Determination on the claim for refund of deposit for lease

A. 1) On September 29, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) on September 29, 2016, the second floor 202 of the building located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Defendant-friendly D.

(2) From October 31, 2016 to October 31, 2018, the instant building was newly constructed on and around January 1, 1991, and the boiler and door even, etc., the Defendant sent a text message to the Plaintiff on October 25, 2016, stating that “A receipt for boiler services is essential for liquor tax payment, and even door-to-door contact is necessary for the Defendant to resolve even if possible.”

3) On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to terminate the lease agreement on the following grounds: “Around October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff received the boiler of the instant building at KRW 1050,000,000, the Plaintiff received the boiler of the instant building on November 50, 2016, stating that “The Plaintiff did not live remarkably in the instant building, and did not properly see that he did not do so, and that the Plaintiff would claim only KRW 1050,000,000,000, the cost of which was much incurred, and KRW 400,000,000.

5) On January 27, 2017, at the boiler installed in the benda of the instant building, the Plaintiff’s goods (equipment, supplies, and household items necessary for the installation of cable broadcasts) sucked out in the boiler installed in the benda of the instant building. The Defendant suffered damage to the water leakage of 102 on the lower floor of the instant building. The Defendant had borne the costs, thereby newly drawing the 102 double and the upper board. 6) The Plaintiff accepted the distribution machine of boiler amounting to KRW 70,000 on January 30, 2017.

7. On February 1, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) caused physical damage to the Plaintiff on January 27, 2017 due to the boiler pipes laid down; (b) paid money directly to a repair engineer on January 30, 2017 without operating the boiler; (c) the Plaintiff’s computer monitor failure in the house, resulting in a serious sprinking of the sprink in the instant building; and (d) the Plaintiff’s computer monitor failure was unable to look any longer in the instant building; and (c) director cost and the sprink board.