All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order A;

A. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Examining the following circumstances, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal, the sentencing of the lower court that sentenced the Defendant A to 10 years of imprisonment cannot be deemed to be extremely unfair.

B. The lower court ordered Defendant A to attach an electronic tracking device for 20 years by deeming that the risk of recommitting a sexual crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the risk of recommitting sexual crimes, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, which found Defendant B guilty of the facts charged (excluding the part dismissing prosecution) against Defendant B.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the ground

Therefore, the defendant B is sentenced to a more minor punishment.