1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Company owns 8,00 shares of the Plaintiff Company (80%) and 500 shares (80%) of the Plaintiff Company, D, the Defendant’s spouse of the Defendant, and 1,500 shares (15%) of Plaintiff B, the Defendant’s spouse of the Defendant, respectively, as a corporation with the purpose of afforestation and afforestation, prevention of blight and harmful insects, etc., but the Plaintiff Company was actually managing the Defendant, the Defendant, the Defendant of which invested the total amount of capital.

B. On February 17, 2012, the Defendant resigned from the representative director, and transferred 8,000 shares of the Plaintiff Company to the Plaintiff B on February 20, 2012, and the Plaintiff B operated the Plaintiff Company since that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 12 evidence, Eul evidence 1 (including additional evidence; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs 1 company leased the building E owned by the defendant on April 30, 2006, to the same year.

6. 26. 35 million won, and 5 million won on December 22 of the same year paid to the defendant as the lease deposit, and the above lease contract terminated on April 30, 2009, the defendant is obligated to refund the above lease deposit to the plaintiff company 40 million won.

2) After the Defendant resigned from the representative director of the Plaintiff Company, the amount equivalent to KRW 3,090,90,909, the value equivalent to KRW 274,500, the value equivalent to KRW 274,500, the value equivalent to KRW 27,686,00, the value equivalent to KRW 7,686,00, and the value equivalent to KRW 2,745,000, the value equivalent to KRW 2,745,000,

(3) Since the Defendant disposed of the Plaintiff without permission, it is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff Company for damages of KRW 13,796,409 in total, the Defendant paid KRW 9,913,940 to the Plaintiff Company on February 2, 2012, even though it agreed to pay KRW 9,913,940, which was not paid by the Plaintiff Company while transferring the Plaintiff Company to the Plaintiff Company to the Plaintiff Company, and thus, the Defendant paid KRW 9,913,940 to the Plaintiff Company.